User Spike113 went to see Avengers! That already introduces a huge amount of selection bias, as the people who are going to see the movie are predisposed to like the movie. Where did all these children come from and how did they find Slashdot?Here's a clue: Data privacy matters.

The percentage of Approved Tomatometer Critics who have given this movie a positive reviewThe percentage of users who rated this 3.5 stars or higher. I do find it interesting when viewers give a movie a better score than reviewers, often for midling movies (around 50ish from reviewers). You can keep using GitHub but automatically sync your GitHub releases to SourceForge quickly and easily with "Professional" reviewers may be pompous, contrarian, or just plain mean-spirited... but when a hundred or more of them are jumbled into a consensus I generally find it's not dissimilar to my own opinion.That's nice.

Sometimes it's hard to tell a good satire from someone playing it straight (And the *chan kiddies make it even more difficult when they say what they feel and then pretend it was all just a joke). Change machines, snack machines, bus fareboxes, and grocery self-checkouts all take bank notes.what privacy? The 'Review bombers' goal. If someone else tries to use the same ticket (or a photo of it), the app will reject it since it has already been used. But just in case some dumbass wants to mod this drivel up...I'm guessing not, because only hypocritical assholes make the argument you're making.More importantly: no one has an inalienable right to expression on a website run by a corporation!It seems to me that freedom of expression on a corporate website built for the purpose of user expression is, in fact, a right. Not everyone buys a ticket, there are other ways to watch movies that I wont mention.Trademarks property of their respective owners. If the audience reviews dip into the B range, that movie is in trouble (maybe because it's actually terrible, maybe because the audience thought it was going to be a different sort of movie and were disappointed by that). Nerds on the Internet hated The Last Jedi (I didn't like it much, but not to the degree of loathing that you'll typically find here). From the summary:

Second, if I feel so strongly about a film that I think the Internet wants to know my opinion--as though that would What are they thinking?

Please, Please, be very careful in going this direction. Taking out fake reviews might not raise scores, it might even lower thWhat a brilliant idea! I don't know if they noticed but there are a lot of places outside of the US, how will they verify those people, whether they are "allowed" to rate a film?Why not just go all the way and remove user reviews? I just happen to think yours is a bit too absoluteAccording to TFS, Fandango owns RT. First, I couldn't care less what the denizens of Rotten Tomatoes think about a movie (that site's operators appear to be rather full of themselves, no?). Just confirm how you got your ticket.Fandango Then they could simply generate two scores - one with the dishonest account review scores, and one without. )Let me guess one reason why RT launched the feature before accommodating box office purchases: Tickets purchased online carry a convenience fee. There's nothing worse than going to see a movie because the trailer looks funny, and after watching it, you realize that every single funny moment was in the trailer, and the rest of the movie was downright dreary.movie tickets usually don't have any personal details written on themTickets purchased online have a credit card transaction ID and a ticketing site user ID. "Later this year, AMC Theatres and Regal and Cinemark ticketing sites will also be participating. If they want to watch films based on identity politics instead of whether the film is actually any good then why shouldn't they have a resource that supports them.

That doesn't mean it's bad, even if The Orville manages to break 7.5M once DVR/Hulu viewings are taken into account, it'd still be impressive given the show isn't available for free.

You're like that guy who complains about the road outside of his house falling apart and then complains abo That'll be a really big "No Thanks". Don’t worry, it won’t take long. it is not known whether or not that subset is representative of the entire sampleAnd having what amount to essentially anonymous reviews does?I mean, when a movie is so bad I don't even want to watch it just from seeing trailers and such, I don't need reviewers to tell me what to think.Case in point, there are folks who derive joy from creating trailers that make movies of one genre look like they're in a When random people do that years later, it's hilarious, but when movie companies do it, it is annoying. Rotten Tomatoes, home of the Tomatometer, is the most trusted measurement of quality for Movies & TV. Generally, for whatever reasons, STD just isn't resonating with the publThe numbers don't really support that.

friends, families, trailers, advertising, reviews, etc.). They don't have to let you use it.It's RT's bakery.

Comments owned by the poster.